NFT news: Salesforce NFTs, Latvian NFT money laundering, gamers still hate NFTs

  • Remember NFTs? Weren’t they wild.
  • Don’t forget to sign up for my Patreon — your $5 or $20 a month really does help! [Patreon]
  • Patrons also get a couple of free “Bitcoin: It can’t be that stupid” stickers for the asking. Just sign up and send me your postal address. [Patreon]
  • Sign up to get these newsletters, and all other blog posts, by email the moment they go up. [scroll down, or click here]

 

 

Put your claim into Tempo House

Salesforce is a business services company. Their market is medium to large companies — they sell business intelligence, customer relationship management, identity services and so on. My day job uses Salesforce; their stuff isn’t perfect, but it’s more useful than not.

Late last year, a C-level executive at Salesforce got a crypto bee in his bonnet … and decided that NFTs were the hot new thing to get into.

Salesforce wouldn’t do NFTs itself — its business is selling the shovels. So instead, Salesforce would provide a white-label NFT marketplace to other businesses! This was hugely controversial internally, with engineers ready to walk.

After months of work, the project was finally released … in June 2022, when the Web3 venture capitalists had already stopped pretending the NFT market wasn’t dead. The pilot offering uses an unspecified proof-of-stake blockchain, and offers to buy carbon credits for you. Pricing is not publicly available — “Connect with your account executive to learn more.” [TechCrunch; NFT Cloud]

Salesforce previously introduced a blockchain product in 2019. Nobody cared then either. [TechCrunch, 2019]

Your brain is Game Boy

Gamers loathe NFTs. They’re already sick of loot boxes, pay-to-win and other attempts by the game companies to grift the players, and NFTs were the last straw.

A pile of NFT and blockchain game companies tried to buy respectability by sponsoring Brazil’s International Games Festival in early July. [Overloadr, in Portuguese]

Indie developers were outraged, and threatened to boycott BIG over the crypto sponsorship. Developer Mark Venturelli decided to appear nevertheless, and did a talk … called “Why NFTs are a nightmare.” He revealed his talk’s real title a few minutes in. The sponsors were outraged, and attempted to get his talk cut off — but the organisers, who’d reviewed the slides beforehand, let it keep going. [PCGamer]

Here’s the talk, and an English translation of Venturelli’s slides. [YouTube, in Portuguese, with English subtitles; Google Docs]

Saw the Holy Ghost I swear on the screen

There can’t ever have been any such thing as Second Life, or all this Metaverse hype would just be stupid.

Metaverse games are going down the toilet. “GameFi” (what a cursed term) activity on Ethereum dropped by 96% from November 2021 to June 2022. [Bitcoinist]

Microsoft doesn’t want NFT trading in Minecraft. “The speculative pricing and investment mentality around NFTs takes the focus away from playing the game and encourages profiteering, which we think is inconsistent with the long-term joy and success of our players.” [Mojang]

NFT Worlds wanted to do “decentralised gaming metaverses” in Minecraft. On Microsoft’s announcement, NFT Worlds’ NFTs dropped to a third of their previous price. NFT Worlds has warned that this move may have “painful downstream effects” in the future for Microsoft. Oh no! NFT Worlds’ tweet was a screenshot of a post to their Discord. [Twitter]

Author Neal Stephenson — who coined the word “Metaverse” — has accepted a dump truck full of ETH being backed up to his house. He’s working on a Metaverse project called Lamina1 with bitcoin old-timer Peter Vessenes. Remember: only buy your Torment Nexus from the original creator! [CoinDesk; press release]

Remember Stephenson’s kickstarted virtual reality game Clang, from 2012? I bet the people who gave him money sure do. [Wired]

Monkey laundering

Yuga Labs, the company behind the Bored Ape Yacht Club, is launching its Metaverse game, Otherside! 4,500 Bored Ape holders logged on to experience … an hour-long scripted demo. “The users were all suited up as multicolored robot avatars, with only a single Bored Ape in sight, albeit a very large one.” The first gameplay demo showcased “a 4,500 vs. 1 boss fight.” Yuga had previously sold 55,000 plots of virtual land in Otherside. The game isn’t finished yet, and there’s no solid launch date. [TechCrunch]

All my apes, decentralised — there have been multiple thefts of Bored Apes in May and June. “This article has been updated because even more apes were stolen.” [New York Times; Slate]

Oh no! The Bored Ape themed restaurant … no longer accepts payments in crypto. Your ApeCoin is no good here, sir. [LA Times]

Law firm Scott and Scott has spotted an opportunity for a securities class action suit against Yuga Labs. Their claim will be that that the Bored Ape NFTs themselves constituted an investment contract, hence an unregistered offering of securities to the retail public under the Howey test. Also Apecoin, which is more obviously the sort of thing that’s been found to be a security in the past. Even if they’re not securities, any material misrepresentation on Yuga Labs’ part could be used to make a case for wire fraud. This case is entirely prospective so far — Scott and Scott don’t have any plaintiffs as yet. [Scott+Scott; Artnet News]

How flair is punished

NBA Top Shot was the only mainstream NFT project ever to get the interest of any of the general public. It suffered from Dapper Labs’ apparent unwillingness to actually pay out traders the money they’d made from sales on the platform.

Now Top Shot’s losing both users and price fast. In February 2021, the average price of a Top Shot was $181.81; by June 2022, it was $17.71. But withdrawals are apparently working fine now, so that’s nice.

A lot of Top Shot traders became early Bored Apes traders. “Some people left Top Shot and bought a bunch of cats and apes and stuff and became millionaires. And the people that stuck to Top Shot lost money. There’s no easy way to say that.” [The Verge]

A group of NBA players formed their own NFT project, separate from Top Shot, called Players Only. The project roadmap promised all sorts of interactions with the players — who never showed up for events, or even for Zoom meetups — and signed merchandise, which didn’t happen either.

The project creators announced in May that they would be “stepping back on the project.” ZachXBT calls Players Only “a $1.4m NFT rug pull.” [Web 3 Is Going Great; Twitter]

Kicker conspiracy

Former AFL footballer Ricky Jackson and his son Corey have been hitting the sports NFT markets hard, and racked up a string of failed ventures.

Sportemon Go launched in June 2021. The Jacksons promised a vast array of endorsement deals, international club partnerships, fan experiences and an NFT marketplace. Sportemon Go had its own crypto-token as well, SGO.

Back in reality, only a few NFTs were ever issued, and SGO crashed. The company dumped SGO on its suckers to pay the bills.

“Ricky Jackson and his son Corey now have a bunch of other crypto-based ventures in the works. These include a virtual greyhound racing game where you can purchase an NFT dog, and an algorithmic stable coin project that they say will give former Sportemon Go holders 100 times returns on the value of their old coins after five years.” [SBS]

Crypto has its tendrils into English Premier League football. “Of last season’s 20 Premier League clubs, all of them but one have at least one cryptocurrency sponsor and some have several.” (The exception is Brighton and Hove Albion — though they did have a sponsorship from crypto futures brokerage eToro for a while.) The clubs mostly sign up to do NFTs and “fan token” deals with crypto company Socios. [The Athletic]

I’ve got this letter before me. It’s buff with a confidential seal

Latvian NFT artist Ilja Borisovs, a.k.a. Shvembldr, says that Latvian authorities have accused him of money laundering — with a possible 12 year jail sentence. [Finbold; Art Is Crime]

Borisovs says he was first contacted in October 2021 by the State Security Service over his NFT sales. His bank accounts were frozen on 10 February 2022. He says the police “refused” to contact him. In May, he found out he was under criminal investigation for money laundering. Borisovs says the police want him to show the origin of funds for every buyer of one of his NFTs. [Twitter]

Borisovs says he released 3,557 NFTs in 2021, making 4,253 ETH in sales, or 8.7 million euros. Borisovs emphasises that he’s paid all his taxes in full.

But the authorities aren’t accusing Borisov of tax evasion — they’re accusing him of money laundering. And money launderers understand how important it is that you pay, and even overpay, your taxes.

Borisovs alleges extensive incompetence and malfeasance by the authorities. This all could involve corruption at every level of the law in Latvia — but it could, at the same time, involve laundering millions of euros through the NFT markets. And you don’t usually detail every step of a money laundering investigation to your suspect.

@BoringSleuth details some dodgy-looking flows of ETH and apparent wash-trading by Borisovs, of the sort that might cause a raised eyebrow from the money-laundering cops. He also details Borisov’s alternate artist names, which trade with each other. [Twitter thread; Twitter thread; Twitter thread]

At least Borisovs’ generative art is more interesting than bad pixel cartoons. [i-illucid]

Coinbase goes to the movies

Who on earth at Coinbase thought this Apecoin ad was a good idea. [Twitter]

 

 

Fol de rol

OpenSea, the largest NFT marketplace, has laid off 20% of their staff. They announced this by tweeting a screenshot from their Discord. [Twitter]

My NFT market, it is very sick. But Christie’s is determined to ride NFTs into the ground and below. They’re starting Christie’s Ventures, “to supply seed funding to young companies whose technologies could ultimately help collectors buy and sell more art, digital or otherwise.” Christie’s has already invested in LayerZero, which endeavours to move NFTs across different blockchains. [WSJ, paywalled]

NFTs are subject to sales tax in the state of Washington. [Department of Revenue]

NFT NYC was a roaring “ehh whatever” of a conference. But it did send attendees home with COVID. Amy Castor wrote up the “Huge Cry Fest” for Artnet. [NFTEvening; Artnet]

Chevrolet got into NFTs, with an NFT of its 2023 Corvette Z06 — including the car! It got zero bids. This was probably because the NFT was being sold for about twice the new sticker price of the car without an NFT. Still foolishly thinking that the NFT market was a thing that existed, Chevrolet even extended the auction by 24 hours. [SuperRare; Corvette Blogger]

The Kodakcoin ICO shut down around November 2020, after the ICO failed utterly and Ryde lost their licence to the Kodak name. So whatever happened to the Kodakcoin ICO team, a.k.a. Ryde Holding? They’re pumping NFTs, of course. [Twelve X Twelve]

No, a UK judge didn’t actually rule that NFTs are property. One of the lawyers involved wrote a breathless blog post on the subject in April, before the judgement was released. [36 Group] Specifically, the lawyer’s claim that the court recognised NFTs “as a specific class of cryptoassets, distinct from cryptocurrency due to their non-fungible unique nature” is not true — the judge did not distinguish NFTs as a special kind of property. There is still no law linking an NFT token to the asset it points to, without an additional specific contract or licence to this effect. [Artnet; judgement]

Mike “Beeple” Winkelmann sold a JPEG for $69 million in March 2021. These days he’s still making art — and getting into physically-existing stuff — but without having to work a day job. The article also stresses that Winkelmann is “fiscally conservative,” which sounds like he wouldn’t shut up about it to the interviewer. [Vulture]

FT Alphaville writes on Vitalik Buterin’s plan for “soul tokens” on the blockchain, written in concert with Glen Weyl, his current pet crank. With quotes from me: “What Buterin wants to implement here is a binding permanent record on all people, on the blockchain. It’s Black Mirror’s ‘Fifteen Million Merits’, except he seriously thinks this is a good idea.” LessWrong and Slate Star Codex risk permanent damage to one’s ability to do the reading before blessing the world with your instant wisdom. [FT, free with login]

 

 

 

 

 

 



Become a Patron!

Your subscriptions keep this site going. Sign up today!

9 Comments on “NFT news: Salesforce NFTs, Latvian NFT money laundering, gamers still hate NFTs”

  1. Excellent ‘The Fall’ content in the display type this time around (yes I caught ‘Fol de Rol’!) More great information that I don’t understand and that I share with all my friends (hope some of them have joined on Patreon!) keep up the good work!

  2. that google slides presentation from the brazil conference is superb. worth 10 minutes of your time.

  3. The slides were only ok until Act III when the author presented a brief history of gaming.
    A few notes:

    Weber points to three types of legitimacy (i.e. trust in the system) – charismatic, traditional, and value-rational bureaucratic. This presentation has a bias towards the third option, which may not actually be more trustworthy as what is “rational” is defined by the prevailing authority structures in any given context. NB for here: Dahl’s notion of who decides is who has power.

    The slides also prioritize centralized systems, yet centralized systems are not necessarily the most rational or productive. They often suffer from systematic blindness to occurrences in local settings, which can cause massive black swan events. Google / Facebook / Meta / X Big Corporation may emerge as the leaders of the next gen or they may miss what drives the next generation of gaming and a new company or even dozens of new companies may emerge in a form of alliance. Why would gaming need to be heavily centralized? What benefits do games derive from mega-corporations? A university is not necessarily better because of centralized decision-making, so why would a game be different?

    The key element of the talk is trust. Blockchain is trying to solve for trust in a global society where you have no knowledge of the other. Whether it does that or not is a common theme of this blog. Yet, notice how the slides on trust always default to a more local setting – I trust my fellow citizens is a question of how strong a community is. Yet these same people often do not trust the intentions of ppl from other countries. So where does this trust come from?

    Trust may emerge from shared values (Durkheim’s mechanical solidarity), or shared interests (Durkheim’s organic solidarity based on shared commercial interests). But to assume that Durkheim is wrong on the second one without a detailed response to his claim is not helpful. Probably more helpful way to think about trust is through Game Theory, where trust can be gained at scale because respondents have a credible threat (a trigger). Game Theory predicts that trust can even be generated amongst ppl who are strangers based on long-term shared expectations about outcomes (itself built on reputation). That means that blockchain is not a substitute for governance but a means of governance. Players may shun other players who exhibit bad behavior. Games may render an account worthless if it breaks the terms of service.

    I read this blog a lot. The Skepticism presented here is useful to help avoid drinking the Kool Aid. Yet I don’t think the future of blockchain gaming is decided yet. A version of Durkheim’s organic solidarity may emerge in gaming, or it may not. But to say that it wil not is another thing entirely.

    1. Large groups of people have come together from across the world in mostly decentralized ways to build meaningful things (like Wikipedia), and it didn’t take slavish worship of crackpot libertarian conspiracy theory or wasting a small country’s worth of electricity to do so.

      Coiner cultists love parroting this idiotic false dichotomy where any who don’t embrace crypto’s specific interpretation of ‘trustless governance’ must necessarily otherwise be subject to the totalitarian whims of some all-encompassing central authority. ‘Blockchain gaming’ won’t rise or fall based on the characteristics of interpersonal dynamics within gamer and game developer communities. It’ll fall because the technology is laughably unfit for purpose and the promised vision is hideously unappealing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.