New book! Libra Shrugged: How Facebook’s dream of controlling the world’s money crashed and burned – released 2 Nov 2020

It’s another blockchain book! Except it’s really about that time when Facebook tried to take over the money, and the world stood up and said “yeah, ah, no way.”

Silicon Valley tries to disrupt the world — and the world finally tells them “no.”

Facebook: the biggest social network in the world, with intimate influence over its users’ lives. A stupendous, world-shaping success.

But governments were on Facebook’s case over privacy, abuse of personal data, election-rigging and fake news.

In 2018, Mark Zuckerberg wondered: what if Facebook could pivot to finance? Or, better: what if Facebook started its own private world currency?

Facebook could have so much power that governments couldn’t annoy them any more. It would be the Silicon Valley dream.

Going live 2 November 2020. w00t! Kindle first, paperback and probably audiobook to follow.

The book site is here (please spread this URL):

Wikia kills Uncyclopedia

Wikia bought Uncyclopedia in 2005, drove people to fork in 2013, and are now killing the site as a TOS violation — pretty obviously an excuse, given it’s literally always been like this.

The live site is at Discussions are in progress to merge the Wikia content.

Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain: out July 24!

My book Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain: Bitcoin, blockchain, Ethereum and smart contracts will be released Monday 24 July 2017. You can pre-order it for Kindle (UK store, US store — available worldwide for £4.99, paperback coming soon). Facebook page. Right now I’m working on final final final revisions, and trying to get LibreOffice and Calibre to play nice together …

Wikipedia, right, but on the Blockchain.

I’m writing a book about Blockchain and why literally all of it is terrible garbage you shouldn’t go within a mile of. I probably won’t cover this one: Lunyr: Decentralized Wikipedia on the blockchain

There's a white paper. Now, I've been on Wikipedia since 2004, and I think I might know a thing or two about wiki communities and how they work, and what doesn't work and has failed dismally in the past. The subtitle of the paper is “A decentralized world knowledge base on Ethereum driven by economic incentives”. The idea is that Wikipedia with ads and micropaid contributors will definitely be something that could work, and never mind all the failed attempts to do such things in the past. It's a collection of bad ideas that have previously crashed in multiple cases, with no sign of awareness of the history of failed Wikipedia replacements.

All the people involved are blockchain bafflegab startup people, there's 0 with any background in education, Wikipedia or even content production. I see no evidence any of them have any idea what they're doing here.

Decentralized crowdsourced encyclopedia users rewarded knowledge base API artificial intelligence virtual reality augmented reality buzzword salad stop me before I blockchain again

The important bit is the ICO (Initial Premined Altcoin Offering) for their LUN token running on Ethereum. You use this to buy ads. Note that although they tout decentralised information as a key strength of Lunyr, the advertising is strictly centralised.

Jimmy Wales was less than impressed: “Buzzword salad. The whole idea is stupid . When all you have is a blockchain hammer, everything looks like a crypto-nail.”

Bloody Vox Day's attempted Wikipedia replacement is a less bad idea than this.

Update: Followup, six months later.

“Nostalgia” is another word for “brain rot.”

I was most pleased the day I had a direct lesson that “nostalgia” is another word for “brain rot.”

I remember using a Mac LC 475 all the time in 1995 and 1996, working on a student newspaper. I remembered it as having been just a startling joy to use; haunting in its ease of use.

Then I used Windows 95 with Office 97 for much of 1997.

Then in early 1998 I got in front of an LC 475 again. Holy crap, what is this clunky piece of shit.

Remember: human memory is provably awful, and history is therefore bunk. And you can’t go back again because you’re a different person now.

Two-factor authentication on Wikipedia for admins and up.

Jimmy Wales’ Wikipedia account got hacked the other day, and it turns out a pile of others did too. So two-factor authentication is being made available for everyone with powers from administrator up on any Wikimedia wiki. Go to Special:Preferences and set it up.

(If your account got hacked and has been locked, go to Steward requests. There’s a bit of a queue, please be patient … else it’s time to fire up the powerless sock account.)

It’s still a bit fiddly, so is being rolled out slowly. (The aim is to have it available to all users in due course.) Authentication methods include mobile phone, Google Authenticator and emergency backup numbers you can print out and keep on hand (“scratch codes”). BWolff (WMF) notes:

If you lose your scratch codes and your 2fa device, and you can prove who you are beyond doubt (what “beyond doubt” means I’m not sure, but I guess committed identity is a good choice), then a developer will remove the 2fa from your account. However, please don’t lose your scratch codes.

I use two-factor at work (GMail, Github, AWS) and it’s just fine. This is basically a really good idea.

Note that AutoWikiBrowser will be a bit fiddly, you will need to set up a BotPassword. (AWB plans to support OAuth soonish.)

At least avoiding another Tubgirl is Love incident won’t require distributing RSA keyfobs to the user base. (Though WMF wants to support fobs too.)

Update: Tim Starling on what actually happened. tl;dr change your password and SWITCH ON 2FA, IT’S IMPORTANT.

Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain.

I’m writing a short book on Bitcoin, blockchains, smart contracts and why all this garbage is garbage. I hoped to have it out by now, but it turns out writing is work! My target is 500 usable words a day. Currently at 16,000 words of draft, I expect this to hit 20,000 (almost certainly not more than 25,000) and then I’ll cull it to size.

I’m occasionally ranting about it on my Tumblr. You can read the tag in reverse order or chronological order.

(and no, I probably can’t actually call it Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain. Suggestions welcomed.)

Yes, my edits on cryptocurrency-related articles have helped a great deal in the research …

FAQ answer: Sadly, Amazon Kindle only accepts filthy fiat.

Podcast with me on “Neoreaction A Basilisk.”

Eruditorum Presscast: David Gerard (Neoreaction a Basilisk 1). In which Phil Sandifer and I talk for seventy-five minutes on the wonders of Eliezer Yudkowsky, Mencius Moldbug and Nick Land, the end of the world and the monster lurking in the labyrinth of every philosophy. I dispute that I was “reading neoreactionaries before it was cool” — life is too short to read Moldbug. Phil read him so you don’t have to. Go order a book, it’s really good.

“Neoreaction a Basilisk” by Phil Sandifer is kickstarting.

I’ve spent the last six months editing a book. Phil Sandifer found himself writing about “A genre dominated by, in effect, an AI crank, an extremist technolibertarian, and whatever the fuck Nick Land is” and I begged to preview it. I ended up researching, editing, copyediting and helping with the publicity. It has been six months of solid and hearty yuks and lulz and a sheer delight.

The kickstarter is up now (announcement). So far it’s landed about $1500 in twelve hours; people seem quite keen to get this book. And let me assure you that the stretch goal essays are also things the world needs.

There are also excerpts ([0] [1] [2]) and images of what the conspiracy zine and full colour editions will look like. (If I had $70 of actual money spare I’d be sending it in to get the conspiracy zine and colour editions, which look to be gorgeous productions.)

“Or, to put it another way, this is a book that uses Eliezer Yudkowsky, Mencius Moldbug, and Nick Land as a loosely stitched together foundation on which to build an oddball philosophical structure made of bits of Hannibal, China Mieville, Alan Turing, Thomas Ligotti, John Milton, and a futuristic AI that will torture you for all eternity if you buy a mosquito net.”

edit: and at $3000 in the first 18 hours, Phil decided he’d better preview the $4000 essay, “The Blind All-Seeing Eye of Gamergate.”

Internet fundamentalism doesn’t actually work.

There’s an antipattern that Internet social sites tend to: people get nostalgic for the old times, and think that if they can just get rid of these annoying newcomers they’ll get the old site back again just like they remember.

This never works.

The primary fallacy is that the reason it was interesting back then was that nobody knew what they were doing and what would come next; attempting to encase that in carbonite is unlikely to achieve the desired effect. The secondary fallacy is that they themselves are different people now.

(I’m thinking of two sites I frequent — RationalWiki and LessWrong — going through precisely this angst right now. And of another, where a Usenet newsgroup from 15 years ago just revived itself on Facebook, and it appears to be working precisely because we’re different people now so it’s interesting again and we don’t know what happens next.)

“RETURN TO THE MISSION WILL CURE ALL” just won’t work out like you think it will. All communities have a life cycle and will die; recovering yours will be at least as uncertain as striking out with it originally was.

Wikipedia: We’ve won. No tail-lights. Now what?

Wikipedia has won. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone actually consults, ever. In fact, it’s the first in history that everyone actually reads, rather than just having fond high school memories of. Wikipedia now defines what an “encyclopedia” is in popular conception. Wikipedia conventions now shape the English language.

So we don’t have tail-lights to chase any more. What sets our direction? Do we just drift? What does “encyclopedic” actually mean when we can’t just point at Britannica and assume people will understand? “Do more of whatever it is we’re already doing” is the default for new recruits, but with no direction we risk going over a cliff.

It’s 2014. What is an “encyclopedia”?

For Wikimedia in general, we have a good vision statement with clear implications, and a mission statement which is only slightly adverb-hobbled. Neither has the necessary level of detail to accurately explain Wikipedia to the world as well as to ourselves.

Alec Conroy noted a few years ago, in a fantastic foundation-l post on the terrible content filtering idea:

The further we can get away from the model of elementary schools and towards the model of the global universities, the better.

This gives a conceptual model to work to: Wikimedia as the sum of all university libraries. Obviously, this is far from the complete answer — we already do both more and less than that — but it’s the level of vision we need to chase to automatically know what to do next.

What other examples do we have of conceptual goals on that level?

Edit: Hacker News comments.

What I did on my not-a-holiday to SF.

My passport got back in time and off I went last Wednesday afternoon, to help Wikimedia hire their next Chief Communications Officer, in my capacity as press volunteer of nine years. It’s no longer just “press officer”, but a C-level job, so much more powerful and able to wreak more damage. So, days of interviews, we run them through the combine harvester both ways, they get grilled and tested and we demand they produce shrubberies. The reason to bring an experienced volunteer in is because it is literally impossible to do the job without leveraging volunteer efforts — you simply can’t scale. Apparently I asked highly suitable questions.

Let me reassure my American readers that United’s customer service is every bit as legendary in the UK as in the US. They were actually completely nice, but the trololol comes in (a) making “economy” into fourth class rather than third class (you want “economy plus”, for another $117, if you’re over five feet tall) and (b) having a total of two toilets for the two sections. The pilot’s announcements were mostly doggerel poems about flying.

Arrived at SFO and through border control in about two seconds — I knew wearing the Wikipedia shirt was a good idea. (Seriously, get a shirt — it opens doors. The world loves us!) At 5:40pm (or 1:40am the next day by my body clock), SFO is all but deserted. Called WMF, taxi to meet Sue and James at the office. James offered me one of the several hundred varieties of coffee on hand, I mimed cramming a coffee pod directly into my arm. I got the cup of caffeinated mud I desired. (Jet lag is a major theme of the next week and what I laughingly thought of as a circadian rhythm is still scrambled.) Off to hotel, checked in, discovered the room wifi sucked. #firstworldproblems

Every tech loft conversion in the world is identical. I realise they were modelled on the SF ideal, but I could not tell from the place if I was in Market Street or Old Street. Buy a tube of instant extruded tech loft product, squirt it over the walls and the big silver air conditioning pipes just slide into place! Sprinkle with MacBooks to taste. My visit was marked by a disconcerting lack of culture shock.

To Wikimedia Thursday morning! … for a meeting that was cancelled. So I spent the day hanging out on Facebook. (And discovered Deepak Chopra’s been busted sockpuppeting Wikipedia for the past five years.) Apparently no-one wanted to interrupt me in case I was working on something important, bah. Off with Danese to some coffee shop I forget the name of for an exquisitely nice iced coffee. Wander back (via another couple of tech lofts identical to every other tech loft … really) for the Wikimedia Christmas party, where I got to catch up with all manner of people I knew only online. There exist photos.

Courtesy jet lag, I could get away with caning it once (and delighted in doing jumping jacks at a severely hungover Oliver, who is half my age so should have done rather better), so off to Wikimedia Friday morning for some serious candidate grilling. We set up a particularly evil potential PR disaster (which I won’t detail until all this is over) to see how they handled it. I told them how usually I just post about six paragraphs of “this is the situation, this is what we’ve done before, this is how to get this one to die” to the mailing list, but this time they had to work out the answers. A test of their PR instincts and whether they could ask the right questions. Then a two-hour meeting to go over how they all did.

Then out to the bars with Jed to do what any two techies in a bar do, i.e. complain about work. He took me to Zeitgeist, a rock’n’roll bar filled with pretty young hipsters with script tattoos on their feet. Tell you what, if you’re in SF you can’t complain about American beer. Oliver notes that script tattoos are the direct 2010s equivalent of the 1990s tribal tattoo; so for the 2030s we’ll need tribal script tattoos, in fluorescent and glitter. (I’ve said it, now it’ll happen.)

Back in on Saturday morning for more candidate interviews. Then more dissection of the day’s many interviews … then down the upscale bar with Geoff and Jove for all manner of confidential on-topic (I assure you) discussions.

Sunday morning, I woke up and realised my plane was going at 7:30pm, not 2:30pm. I would have spent the day at SFMOMA, but it’s shut for renovations! Bored, I eventually just went to the airport to leech their wifi. SFMOMA has a lovely shop at SFO, including their catalog for a mere $20. YOU MUST GET THIS.

Got back Monday afternoon London time and went to work Tuesday. Still falling asleep and waking up at random times. Oh, there’s still credit on my BART card.

I am slightly amazed how brilliant just about everyone is at Wikimedia. They put out job specs that say “magical flying unicorn pony that farts rainbows, must have rocketed from Krypton as an infant” … and then they get them. I was amazed how good the CVs were. But the same goes for the people working there. They work like they’re at a hot startup, not a dot-org. Because they’re changing the world.

Go and test the Visual Editor. It’s meaningfully testable.

The Visual Editor is live and in testing on English Wikipedia.

People are past the stage of shouting IT’S A DISASTER AND THE WHOLE PROJECT MUST BE SHUT DOWN (that was last week); it’s reached that sweet spot on the upslope of the logistic curve of progress where the basic functionality is in place, it’s usable enough to beta properly, and all the little finicky bugs are coming out. (“Yes, it edits now, but I WANT A PONY. A nice one, mind you.” “IF YOU CAN MAKE A PONY, A UNICORN IS TRIVIAL.” “YOU CALL THAT A UNICORN? YOU’VE GLUED A CORNETTO TO THE PONY.”) And the devs are actually keeping up with them. Holy crap, they’re successfully flying this beast TO THE MOON.

So, experienced editors: please go test the visual editor on your gnarliest articles. Report any breakage, big or small. Save a bad diff, self-revert then report the breakage. Give Oliver something to do with his copious reserves{{cn}} of free time. (In between coming up with “cornetto unicorn.”) Update: and please check and report problems with newbies using the visual editor. (HT Nemo.)

(The visual editor is somewhat annoying, but it works well enough that the bug reports are useful. I find it easier, if slower, for correcting a typo; harder for adding a sentence with a reference. But the main reason experienced users should be testing it is that it’s important — and experienced users will give it the serious kicking it needs to get the bugs out.)