Binance’s BNB token burn — why this is meaningless nonsense to fool suckers
If you buy into the idea that a “token burn” might make number go up — you’re the sucker in the relationship.
Blockchain and cryptocurrency news and analysis by David Gerard
If you buy into the idea that a “token burn” might make number go up — you’re the sucker in the relationship.
Physicists might tell you that two atoms of a given isotope are literally indistinguishable — but apparently we need “living and synthesized elements, as recommended by Taoist masters.”
Perhaps iFinex can argue that two plus two only appears to make four, when actually it makes three, or five, or six hundred and sixty-six.
“Well, let me get this straight. A company you didn’t buy until 2014 is listed as a beneficiary of a trust document you claimed was formed in 2012?”
I’d question even calling this a “bubble” — because there’s no evidence of an influx of retail get-rich-quick dreamers. The only visible cause is manipulation.
My latest for Foreign Policy is up at last. Here’s audio of the Carlos Maslatón quote.
I think we can definitely speak in terms of Gerald Cotten’s “alleged” death.
And the FUDCon 2019 exploratory committee. With T-shirts for PTK:SV and PTK Classic.
Craig Wright has to explain why he shouldn’t be found in contempt. Never piss off your judge.
Facebook are stressing that everyone should call their coin Libra, and not Facebook-anything. And definitely not ZuckerBucks.