«
»

The Wikipedia/Wikimedia Press Coverage Bingo Card.

Wikipedia is closed to edits now Encyclopedia Britannica is far superior to Wikipedia Knol will kill Wikipedia Wikipedia is public domain Google owns Wikipedia now
Administrators control all articles personally Wikipedia thinks Article X should be deleted Wikipedia is in cahoots with Google for page rank Wikipedia is a socialist conspiracy Yahoo owns Wikipedia now
All schools everywhere forbid Wikipedia Wikia is Wikipedia FREE SPEECH Jimmy Wales approves all Wikipedia articles personally Wikipedia Foundation UK
Wikipedia is a capitalist conspiracy Wikipedia runs Wikileaks Wikipedia is dying Andrew Orlowski will kill Wikipedia Wikipedia must run advertising or it will die
Wikipedia will destroy civilised writing Citizendium will kill Wikipedia Wikipedia contains errors! No-one should use it Microsoft Bing owns Wikipedia now Wikipedia is hiring editors

With the invaluable assistance of unnameable contributors from the communications committee. Wait until a media frenzy, take one shot per square. Fill the card and drain the bottle. Post further suggestions below.

This entry was posted on Saturday, February 27th, 2010 at 1:15 am and is filed under wiki. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “The Wikipedia/Wikimedia Press Coverage Bingo Card.”

  1. Spela bingo « Wikimedia Sverige says:
    Monday 1st March, 2010 at 9:27 pm

    [...] Publicerat av Lennart Guldbrandsson den 01 mars 2010 Användaren David Gerard som är aktiv på engelskspråkiga Wikipedia, och har hanterat massvis med möten med press och TV, har skapat en bingobricka som man kan använda för att pricka in vad media skriver om Wikipedia. Hur många prickar du in i nästa reportage om Wikipedia eller Wikimedia? Du hittar originalet här. [...]

  2. Tips till journalister « Wikimedia Sverige says:
    Wednesday 15th September, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    [...] det bli dags för andra typer av artiklar. Visst vore det tråkigt med samma gamla artiklar som har producerats ända sedan 2001 – och om det vore något annat ämne skulle chefredaktörerna troligen sagt ifrån för [...]

Leave a Reply