http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2011/03/18/the-new-york-times-hands-the-first-draft-of-history-over-to-the-bbc-and-guardian/ arrogant pontification Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:50:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2011/03/18/the-new-york-times-hands-the-first-draft-of-history-over-to-the-bbc-and-guardian/comment-page-1/#comment-15574 David Gerard Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:55:50 +0000 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?p=552#comment-15574 If I’m wrong, then excellent! Where did you see these ones?

]]> http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2011/03/18/the-new-york-times-hands-the-first-draft-of-history-over-to-the-bbc-and-guardian/comment-page-1/#comment-15572 Lodewijk Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:55:02 +0000 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?p=552#comment-15572 Hmm, what do you base the assumption on that media do not donate? Did you consider the possibility that they might donate (but not as much as you would like perhaps) but do not want to disclose that fact? I know at least of two media organizations that donated money last fundraiser – and I have only seen a fraction of the donations made to the Wikimedia Movement.

]]> http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2011/03/18/the-new-york-times-hands-the-first-draft-of-history-over-to-the-bbc-and-guardian/comment-page-1/#comment-15388 Peter da Silva Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:14:01 +0000 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?p=552#comment-15388 It’s not like reporters never re-use the content of each other’s articles without compensation. They don’t get ragged about it unless they “forget” to attribute it. And Wikipedia is downright grindstone about attribution.

]]>