Comments on: Even the Free Software Foundation doesn’t understand the GFDL. http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2008/04/24/even-the-free-software-foundation-doesnt-understand-the-gfdl/ arrogant pontification Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:08:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David Gerard http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2008/04/24/even-the-free-software-foundation-doesnt-understand-the-gfdl/comment-page-1/#comment-9061 David Gerard Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:49:18 +0000 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?p=93#comment-9061 @LA2: I vaguely recall talk of RMS starting a competing project if we didn't go GFDL. (The CC licenses didn't exist then.) I don't have a link to hand. @Chriswaterguy: GFDL 1.3 is due out really soon, dunno if that'll include CC-by-sa compatibility as yet. @LA2: I vaguely recall talk of RMS starting a competing project if we didn’t go GFDL. (The CC licenses didn’t exist then.) I don’t have a link to hand.

@Chriswaterguy: GFDL 1.3 is due out really soon, dunno if that’ll include CC-by-sa compatibility as yet.

]]> By: Chriswaterguy http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2008/04/24/even-the-free-software-foundation-doesnt-understand-the-gfdl/comment-page-1/#comment-9060 Chriswaterguy Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:22:12 +0000 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?p=93#comment-9060 Any idea how long before we can swap between GFDL & CC-by-sa? Any idea how long before we can swap between GFDL & CC-by-sa?

]]> By: LA2 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2008/04/24/even-the-free-software-foundation-doesnt-understand-the-gfdl/comment-page-1/#comment-9020 LA2 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:35:37 +0000 http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?p=93#comment-9020 Come on, it's not the FSF's fault that Wikipedia uses GFDL. Come on, it’s not the FSF’s fault that Wikipedia uses GFDL.

]]>