<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bored? Policy-weary? Write something.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2007/11/01/bored-policy-weary-write-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2007/11/01/bored-policy-weary-write-something/</link>
	<description>arrogant pontification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Brown</title>
		<link>http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2007/11/01/bored-policy-weary-write-something/comment-page-1/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/2007/11/01/bored-policy-weary-write-something/#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>Excellent advice, David.  I&#039;ve always lamented the way too many people don&#039;t look beyond the obvious and realize that Wikipedia is far away from finished, even in terms of article titles.  

Our coverage of the commercial world is lamentable, but I wouldn&#039;t encourage new editors to contribute there; there&#039;s too much of a &#039;Commercial!  That means spam!  Kill it!&#039; attitude among our admins and would-be admin goldfarmers.

Also note that there is an astonishing amount of stuff available in copyright-expired books, through e.g. Google Books.  Beware that scholarship may have advanced since then in academic subjects, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent advice, David.  I&#8217;ve always lamented the way too many people don&#8217;t look beyond the obvious and realize that Wikipedia is far away from finished, even in terms of article titles.  </p>
<p>Our coverage of the commercial world is lamentable, but I wouldn&#8217;t encourage new editors to contribute there; there&#8217;s too much of a &#8216;Commercial!  That means spam!  Kill it!&#8217; attitude among our admins and would-be admin goldfarmers.</p>
<p>Also note that there is an astonishing amount of stuff available in copyright-expired books, through e.g. Google Books.  Beware that scholarship may have advanced since then in academic subjects, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

